Reaction to "Why you should write” by Preetam Nath

    So I just reread "Why you should write” by Preetam Nath.

https://www.preetamnath.com/blog/why-you-should-write

He uses this essay to encourage everybody to write.  He seems to think that any kind of habitual creative activity is good for you.  My own belief is that people have a historic ability to share their thoughts with the future of humanity and that everyone’s perspective is useful, thus, we believe that it is a good idea to write.  Habitual daily writing is good for historical records, sharing your unique perspective, and it makes writing itself much easier.  Writing is a very useful tool for businesses and journalling is both know to be good for your mental health and it documents your thoughts so that you can search through them later.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I’ve been reading “ Category Theory for Programmers ” which was suggested to me by Mark Ettinger.  This book presents many examples in C++ and Haskell.  It teaches you some Haskell as you read the book.  It uses almost zero upper level mathematics and it skips almost all of the mathematical formalities.  If you decide that you want to read it, then you might want to read the first six chapters of “ Learn You a Haskell for Great Good! ” and write a few small Haskell programs first.  (I also would suggest trying to solve the first three problems in Project Euler  https://projecteuler.net/archives   using Haskell.)   I find the book to be easy to read and informative. When the author makes a statement like   A*(B+C) = A*B + A*C where * means categorical product, + means coproduct, and = means isomorphic, I find myself trying to figure out the categories where the statement is true and the categories for which it is false.  (It is true fo...
Read more

History of Math Links

I liked "Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times" by Kline. " The History and Concept of Mathematical Proof " by Krantz (formerly from Penn State!) looks interesting. " Proof: A Brief Historical Survey " looks cool. "A History of Mathematical Proof: Ancient Greece to the Computer Age " is more formal with no pictures and diagrams, but it's written for non-mathematicians. " The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions " by Chemla is AN ENTIRE BOOK devoted to the history of proofs in many cultures. I love "proofs without words". (See e.g.  Wikipedia ,  MAA ,  Sangaku ) The aptly titled article " Aristotle and Mathematics " is more about logic and proof than it is about mathematics.
Read more

Research in the original Master of Orion Game

In the original Master of Orion, each technology has a cost C.  After you spend a certain amount of money on research (usually less than C), you will have a 1% chance per turn of discovering the technology.  If you spend more money, then the probability of discovery increases. Some technologies give you an immediate boost in income—for example, improved eco restoration and reduce industrial waste 80%.   If you only have a 1% chance per turn of discovering these technologies, it would seem to be a good idea to spend a little more on research to improve the probability of discovery thereby decreasing the average time to discovery. The optimal probability of discovery can be deduced from the cost of increasing the probability of discovery and the amount of income the new discovery will produce.  Suppose that it costs   C/100  dollars to increase your discovery probability by 1%.  Further suppose that upon discovery, your income will increase by i doll...
Read more